MU - Archive

Table of contents
  1. 1. Objective
  2. 2. Action-Function
  3. 3. Measurement
  4. 4. Stage 1 - Roadmap Discussion-Comments
  5. 5. SOAPedia Links:
  6. 6. Stage 1 - Objective
  7. 7. Stage 1 - Certification Criteria
  8. 8. Stage 1 - Comment
  9. 9. Stage 2 (for 2013) and Stage 3 (for 2015)
  10. 10.  
  11. 11.  
  12. 12. Meaningful Use for 2011
    1. 12.1. Meaningful Use Measures - Drafts from September, 2009
      1. 12.1.1. 1.  % diabetics with A1c under control.
      2. 12.1.2. 2.  % of hypertensive patients with BP under control.
      3. 12.1.3. 3.  % of patients with LDL under control.
      4. 12.1.4. 4.  % of smokers offered smoking cessation counseling.
      5. 12.1.5. 4a.  % of patients with recorded BMI [OP].
      6. 12.1.6. 4b.  Title: Adult weight screening and follow up.  
      7. 12.1.7. 5.  % eligible surgical patients who received VTE prophylaxis [Inpatient].
      8. 12.1.8. 6.  % of orders (for medications, lab tests, procedures, radiology, and referrals) entered directly by physicians through CPOE.
      9. 12.1.9. 7.  Use of high‐risk medications (Re: Beers criteria) in the elderly
      10. 12.1.10. 8. % of patients over 50 with annual colorectal cancer screenings [OP].
      11. 12.1.11. 9.  % of females over 50 receiving annual mammogram [OP]
      12. 12.1.12. 10.  % patients at high‐risk for cardiac events on aspirin prophylaxis [OP] .
      13. 12.1.13. 11a.  % eligible patients who received flu vaccine [OP].
      14. 12.1.14. 12.  % lab results incorporated into EHR in coded format [OP,IP]
      15. 12.1.15. 13.  Stratify reports by gender, insurance type, primary language, race, ethnicity [OP, IP]. 
      16. 12.1.16. 14.  % of all medications, entered into EHR as generic, when generic options exist in the relevant drug class [EP, IP]
      17. 12.1.17. 15.  % of orders for high-cost imaging services with specific structured indications recorded [EP, IP]
      18. 12.1.18. 16.  % claims submitted electronically to all payers [EP, IP]
      19. 12.1.19. 17.  % patient encounters with insurance eligibility confirmed [EP, IP]
      20. 12.1.20. 18.  % of all patients with access to personal health information electronically [EP, IP]
      21. 12.1.21. 19.  % of all patients with access to patient specific educational resources [EP, IP]
      22. 12.1.22. 20.  % of encounters for which clinical summaries were provided [EP]
      23. 12.1.23. 21.  Report 30‐day readmission rate [IP].
      24. 12.1.24. 22a.  % of encounters where med reconciliation was performed [OP, IP].
      25. 12.1.25. 23.  Implemented ability to exchange health  information with external clinical entity (specifically labs, care summary and medication lists) [OP, IP].
      26. 12.1.26. 24.  % of transitions in care for which summary care record is shared (e.g., electronic, paper, e-Fax) [EP, IP].
      27. 12.1.27. 25.  Report up‐to‐date status for childhood immunizations [OP].
      28. 12.1.28. 26.  % reportable lab results submitted electronically [IP].
      29. 12.1.29. 27.  Full compliance with HIPAA Privacy and  Security Rules.
      30. 12.1.30. 28.  Conduct or update a security risk assessment and implement security updates as necessary.
      31. 12.1.31. 29.  Other Measures Under Consideration.
      32. 12.1.32. 30.  Other Measures Under Consideration.
      33. 12.1.33. 31.  Other Measures Under Consideration.
      34. 12.1.34. 32.  Other Measures Under Consideration -Inpatient .
  13. 13. Standards and Coding Systems
  14. 14. Links
    1. 14.1.  Links - October, 2009
    2. 14.2. Links - July, 2009
    3. 14.3. Links - November, 2009

 

Objective

 

Action-Function

 

Measurement

 

Stage 1 - Roadmap Discussion-Comments

 

SOAPedia Links:
Edit section

------------- 

Stage 1 - Objective

 

Stage 1 - Certification Criteria


 

Stage 1 - Comment

Stage 2 (for 2013) and Stage 3 (for 2015)
Edit section

 -----------------------------------

 

 


 

The information here is evolving and changing rapidly as more information is released from the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC or ONCHIT).

This references the Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act of the American recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). The 2009 economic stimulus package (the Act) passed by Congress and Obama signed into law on 2/17/09. It intends to promote EHR adoption. The Act promises incentive payments to those who adopt and use certified EHRs. In order to receive the stimulus money, the Act requires doctors to:

  1. demonstrate "meaningful use"
  2. utilizing a certified EHR system.

 


 

SOAPware is certified (via CCHIT) through June, 2011 and we will recertify in whatever fashion is necessary for SOAPware users need in order to meet the certification requirements in order to receive the ARRA stimulus funds. There will be alternatives to certification other than CCHIT. SOAPware recertification may be CCHIT or we may choose one of the other "HHS" alternatives that will meet the certification requirements in order to receive the ARRA stimulus funds.

For a more in-depth discussion regarding the certification issues, see - HIT Policy Committee Meeting on Certified EHR  September, 2009

     * There will be a new form of certification. The Policy Committee recommended the term HHS Certified. (The labeling could change if there are issues.)
    * The criteria for HHS Certification are recommended by the Standards Committee to ONC, then submitted for a formal approval process at HHS. As an experienced certifying body, CCHIT is offering suggestions and advice during the comment process, just as other stakeholders are.
    * The Policy Committee recommended that ONC work with NIST to develop an accreditation process for certifying bodies and not place a formal limit on the number of entities that can be accredited.
    * The Committee recognized the importance of leveraging work to date and maintaining momentum. For the near future—until the accreditation process is developed and operational — the Policy Committee recommended that CCHIT certification should be leveraged and that granting Preliminary HHS Certified status for EHR technologies should be done so as not to slow EHR adoption as the final HHS Certification criteria is approved.
    * The Policy Committee recommended that HHS Certification be offered to modular products and that there be flexible approaches for non-vendor software.
    * The Policy Committee recommended that HHS certification requirements focus on meaningful use.

 

Also see - Cost of New CCHIT EHR Certifications September, 2009

It’s still too early to know for sure if other EHR certifying bodies are going to be created to handle the HHS certification requirements for EHR. However, I’m willing to bet that at least a couple will be created.

 

A good review of how the Act impacts SOAPware users is available - "Will the Feds Really Buy Me an EHR?".  A tongue-in-cheek summary of this article is available - The Obamainable Snowplan.

 

It appears that incentives will be paid according to an “adoption year” timeframe rather than a calendar year timeframe. Under this scenario, qualifying for the first-year incentive payment would be assessed using the “2011 Measures.” The payment rate and phase-out of payments would follow the calendar dates in the statute, but qualifying for incentives would use the “adoption-year” approach.

 

 

 

Meaningful Use for 2011
Edit section

  

 

 

Meaningful Use Measures - Drafts from September, 2009
Edit section

Today, the key task for practices is to start to consistently document with SMARText structured items, then that data will be able to be used by registries that do the data extraction and reporting.  So start now  using as much structured SMARText as is possible in Assessment, Active Problems, Medications, Allergies and Plan fields. (Less important in Subjective, Objective, and other fields). For details, see - Documentation Items for Reporting.

  • The necessary reporting will be via registries, to be added, and not via any existing sections in SOAPware such as Data Explorer, Health Maintenance or Clinical Alerts.
  • Health Maintenance or Clinical Alerts can be useful to trigger the collection of the data during patient encounters that will later be automatically reported by the registries.
  • Data Explorer's utility is more as a tool for use within a practice, and does not include any tools to satisfy outside reporting requirements.

 

For illustrations as to why consistent use of SMARText, along with  a registry is required for performance reporting, see Influenza immunization for patients ≥ 50 years old and Quality Reporting Scenario - Example

 

 

1.  % diabetics with A1c under control.
Edit section

Ambulatory
Nursing Home
Primary Care
Endocrine
 

Title: Comprehensive Diabetes Care: HbA1c control (<8.0%)
Description: The percentage of members 18 - 75 years of age with diabetes (type 1 and type 2) who had HbA1c control (<8.0%).
Numerator: Use automated laboratory data to identify the most recent HbA1c test during the measurement year. The member is numerator compliant if the most recent automated HbA1c level is <8.0%. The member is not numerator compliant if the automated result for the most recent HbA1c test is = 8.0% or is missing a result, or if an HbA1c test was not done during the measurement year.
Denominator: Members 18 - 75 years of ages with diabetes.  There are two methods to identify members with diabetes: pharmacy data and claims/encounter data. The organization must use both to identify the eligible population, but a member only needs to be identified in one to be included in the measure. Members may be identified as having diabetes during the measurement year or the year prior to the measurement year.
Method 1: Pharmacy data. Members who were dispensed insulin or oral hypoglycemics/antihyperglycemics during the measurement year or year prior to the measurement year on an ambulatory basis
Method 2: Claim/encounter data. Members who had two face-to-face encounters with a diagnosis of diabetes on different dates of service in an outpatient setting or nonacute inpatient setting, or one face-to-face encounter in an acute inpatient or ED setting during the measurement year or the year prior to the measurement year. The organization may count services that occur over both years.
Exclusions:
- Members with a diagnosis of polycystic ovaries who did not have any face-to-face encounters with a diagnosis of diabetes, in any setting, during the measurement year or the year prior to the measurement year. Diagnosis can occur at any time in the member’s history, but must have occurred by December 31 of the measurement year.
- Members with gestational or steroid-induced diabetes who did not have any face-to-face encounters with a diagnosis of diabetes, in any setting, during the measurement year or the year prior to the measurement year. Diagnosis can occur during the measurement year or the year prior to the measurement year, but must have occurred by December 31 of the measurement year.
Time Window: The measurement year or year prior to the measurement year.

Note: Should capture HbA1c value to enable stratification as well as broad adherence to all individuals <8.0%
[OP]
Steward: NCQA
Endorsed: Under review 11/21/2008

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- patient age
- active diabetes diagnosis
- active gestational diabetes diagnosis
- active polycystic ovarian disease diagnosis
- steroid induced diabetes active diagnosis
- insulin prescription
- hypoglycemic medication prescription
- antihyperglycemic medication prescription
- HbA1c result

 

Recommend

Endorsement expected within the next month. For retooling, diabetes on the Problem List (ICD-9 or SNOMED), or Medication List with appropriate medication

 

For example, see Hemoglobin A1c poor control in diabetes mellitus at Diabetes Mellitus - PQRI

 

 

2.  % of hypertensive patients with BP under control.
Edit section

Ambulatory
Home Health
Primary Care
Cardiology
Endocrine
 

Title Controlling High Blood Pressure*
Description: Percentage of patients with last BP < 140/80 mm Hg.
Numerator: Patients with last blood pressure measurement adequately controlled to systolic blood pressure < 140 mm Hg and diastolic blood pressure < 80 mm Hg during the measurement year.
Denominator: All patients > 18 years of age with a diagnosis of hypertension in the first six months of the measurement year or any time prior.

Patient Selection:
ICD-9-CM codes for Hypertension: 401.0, 401.1, 401.9, 402.xx, 403.xx, 404.xx

A patient is considered to be hypertensive if there is at least one outpatient encounter (outpatient or other outpatient services - 99201-99205, 99211-99215, 99241, 99245) with a diagnosis of hypertension (applicable ICD-9 codes) during the first six months of the measurement year. To confirm the diagnosis of hypertension, notation of the following must be found in the medical record on or before June 30 of the measurement year:
• HTN
• high blood pressure (HBP)
• elevated blood pressure
• borderline HTN
• intermittent HTN
• history of HTN.

The notation of hypertension may appear anytime on or before June 30 of the measurement year, including prior to the measurement year. It does not matter if hypertension was treated or is currently being treated. The notation indicating a diagnosis of hypertension may be recorded on any of the following documents:
• a problem list
• office note,
• subjective, objective, assessment, plan (SOAP) note,
• encounter form,
• telephone call record,
• diagnostic report, and/or
• hospital discharge summary.

Statements such as “rule out hypertension,” “possible hypertension,” “white-coat hypertension,” “questionable hypertension,” and “consistent with hypertension” are not sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of hypertension if such statements are the only notations of hypertension in the medical record.
Exclusions: None
[OP] NCQA

 

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- hypertension diagnosis
- elevated blood pressure diagnosis
- borderline hypertension diagnosis
- intermittent hypertension diagnosis
- history of hypertension
- ambulatory encounter
- systolic blood pressure result
- diastolic blood pressure result

 

Recommend

History of hypertension currently from ICD code list. For retooling
'notation' should indicate presence on the Problem List.

 

For example, see High blood pressure control in diabetes mellitus at Diabetes Mellitus - PQRI

 

 

3.  % of patients with LDL under control.
Edit section

Ambulatory
Nursing Home
Home Health
Primary Care
Cardiology
Endocrine
Neurology 

Title: IVD: Complete Lipid Profile and LDL Control  <100
Description: Percentage of patients with a full lipid profile completed during the 12-month measurement period with date of each component of the profile documented; LDL-C<100.

Numerator 1: Number of patients with a full lipid profile completed during the 12-month measurement period with date of each component of the profile documented.
• Identify the most recent visit to the doctor’s office or clinic that occurred during the measurement year (but after the diagnosis of IVD was made) in which a full lipid profile was documented.
• Each component of the lipid profile must be noted with the date of the laboratory test and results.

Numerator 2: Number of patients with a LDL completed during the 12-month abstraction period with date and LDL less than 100 mg/dl documented.
CPT II codes for compliance: 3048F
CPT II codes for non-compliance: 3049F, 3050F
Denominator A systematic sample of patients, age 18 years and older with a diagnosis of ischemic vascular disease (IVD) for at least 12 months, who have been under the care of the physician or physician group for IVD for at least 12 months (this is defined by documentation of a face-to-face visit for IVD care between the physician and the patient that predates the most recent IVD visit by at least 12 months.)

Codes to Identify a Patient with a Diagnosis of Ischemic Vascular Disease:-
ICD-9: 411, 413, 414.0, 414.8, 414.9, 429.2, 433-434, 440.1, 440.2, 444, 445
DRG: 140, 559

If using health plan administrative claims to identify the eligible population and then attributing to physicians, use the following denominator specifications:

Discharged alive for AMI, CABG or PTCA on or between 1/1-11/1 of the year prior to the measurement year or at one outpatient or acute inpatient during the measurement year and year prior to the measurement year.

AMI: ICD-9: 410.x1, DRG: 121, 122, 516
PTCA: CPT: 33140, 92980-92982, 92984, 92995, 92996, ICD-9:00.66, 36.01, 36.02, 36.05, 36.06, 36.07, 36.09, DRG: 516, 517, 526, 527, 555-558
CABG: CPT: 33510-33514, 33516-33519, 33521-33523, 33533-33536, 35600, 33572, HCPCS: S2205-S2209, ICD-9:36.1, 36.2, DRG: 106, 107, 109, 547-550

Codes to Identify a Patient with a Diagnosis of Ischemic Vascular Disease:-
ICD-9: 411, 413, 414.0, 414.8, 414.9, 429.2, 433-434, 440.1, 440.2, 444, 445
DRG: 140, 559

Outpatient Codes: CPT: 99201-99205, 99211-99215, 99217-99220, 99241-99245, 99341-99345, 99347-99350, 99384-99387, 99394-99397, 99401-99404, 99411, 99412, 99420, 99429, 99455, 99456, 99499, UB-92: 051x, 0520-0523, 0526-0529, 057x-059x, 077x, 0982, 0983
Acute inpatient: CPT: 99221-99223, 99231-99233, 99238, 99239, 99251, 99255, 99261-99263, 99291, UB-92: 010x, 0110-0114, 0119, 0120-0124, 0129, 0130-0134, 0139, 0140-0144, 0149, 0150-0154, 0159, 016x, 020x-022x, 072x, 0987

Presentation of Codes:
Unless otherwise noted, codes are stated to the minimum specificity required. For example, if a three digit code is listed, it is valid as a three-, four- or five-digit code. When necessary, a code may be specified with an “x” which represents a required digit. For example ICD-9 CM diagnosis code 640.0x means that a fifth digit is required, but the fifth digit could be any number allowed by the coding manual.
Exclusions Exclude patient self-report or self-monitoring, LDL to HDL ratio and findings reported on progress notes or other non-laboratory documentation.

[OP]
Steward: NCQA

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- active ischemic vascular disease diagnosis
- ambulatory care encounter
- lipid profile result
- LDL result
- LDL to HDL ratio
- non-laboratory documentation of LDL
- hospital discharge diagnosis AMI
- hospital discharge diagnosis CABG
- PTCA procedure
- discharge status alive

 

Recommend

For retooling, compliance requires presence of LDL result during the measurement year. Diagnosis in
the ambulatory record requires entry on the Problem List with ICD-9 or SNOMED coding.

 

For example, see Low density lipoprotein cholesterol control in diabetes mellituss at Diabetes Mellitus - PQRI

 

 

4.  % of smokers offered smoking cessation counseling.
Edit section

Ambulatory
Nursing Home
Home Health
Primary Care
Pediatrics
 

Title:  Measure pair - a. Tobacco use prevention for infants, children and adolescents, b. Tobacco use cessation for infants, children and adolescents*
Description: Percentage of patients’ charts showing either that there is no tobacco use/exposure or (if a user) that the current use was documented at the most recent clinic visit
Percentage of patients with documented tobacco use or exposure at the latest visit who also have documentation that their cessation interest was assessed or that they received advice to quit
Numerator:
a: Number of patients' charts audited whose current tobacco status is documented in the medical record
b: Number of tobacco users advised to quit or whose readiness to quit was assessed at the latest visit.
Denominator a: Total number of patients' charts audited
b: Total number of tobacco users audited
Exclusions a: inclusions: total number of patient charts audited exclusions: none. The measures applies to all patients visiting the practice, regardless of age, who have any indication on their charts that they are or may be users of tobacco, or in the case of children that they are regularly exposed to tobacco smoke
b: inclusions: total number of patient charts audited exclusions: none The measures applies to all patients visiting the practice, regardless of age, who have any indication on their charts that they are or may be users of tobacco, or in the case of children that they are regularly exposed to tobacco smoke

[OP]
Steward: Institute for Clinical Systems Improvement
 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- outpatient encounter
- smoking history
- smoking cessation counseling / advice
- smoking readiness to quit assessment


Recommend

Requires that smoking is addressed at every visit. May need to use CPT II attestation for 2011.

 

For example, see Inquiry regarding tobacco use and Advising smokers to quit at Preventive Care and Screening - PQRI

 

4a.  % of patients with recorded BMI [OP].
Edit section

Title: Body Mass Index (BMI) 2 through 18 years of age*

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics


Description: Percentage children, 2 through 18 years of age, whose weight is classified based on BMI percentile for age and gender
Numerator: Number of children 2 through 18 years of age who came in for a well child visit in the measurement period month and who were classified based on BMI percentile for age and gender.
Denominator: Number children 2 through 18 years of age, with a well child visit in the measurement period month.
Exclusions: None

[OP]
National Initiative for Children's Healthcare Quality

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- ambulatory encounter
- BMI
- gender

 

Recommend

Limited to Pediatrics; BMI present in Vital Signs

 

 

4b.  Title: Adult weight screening and follow up.  
Edit section

Ambulatory
Nursing Home
Home Health
Primary Care
Cardiology
Endocrine
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry

Description: Percentage of patients aged 18 years and older with a calculated BMI documented in the medical record AND if the most recent BMI is outside the parameters, a follow up plan is documented. Parameters: age 65 and older BMI > or = 30 or < 22; age 18-64 BMI > or = 25 or< 18.5
Numerator: Patients with BMI calculated in the past six months and a follow-up plan documented if the BMI is outside of parameters
Denominator Patients 18 years and older
Exclusions: Patients can be considered not eligible in the following situations:
- There is documentation in the medical record that the patient is over or under weight and is being managed by another provider
- If the patient has a terminal illness
- If the patient refuses BMI measurement
- If there is any other reason documented in the medical record by the provider explaining why BMI measurement was not appropriate
- Patient is in an urgent or emergent medical situation where time is of the essence and to delay treatment would jeopardize the patient’s health status.

[OP]
CMS

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- BMI
- terminal illness
- patient refusal
- medical exclusion
- urgent / emergent medical situation

 

Recommend

BMI present in Vital Signs Exclusion (i.e., "terminal illness," and "urgent/emergent medical
situation") may be complex and may be relaxed for 2011.

 

Also see Record vital signs - height, weight, blood pressure, BMI.

 

 

5.  % eligible surgical patients who received VTE prophylaxis [Inpatient].
Edit section

Title: Surgery Patients Who Received Appropriate Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis Within 24
Hours Prior to Surgery to 24 Hours After Surgery End Time*
Description: Percentage of surgery patients who received appropriate Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Prophylaxis within 24 hours prior to surgery to 24 hours after surgery
Surgery patients with recommended VTE prophylaxis ordered during the admission
Denominator: All selected surgery patients (i.e., patients receiving general or neuraxial anesthesia)
Exclusions:
- Patients who are less than 18 years of age. Patients with procedures performed entirely by laparoscope.
Patients whose total surgery time is less than or equal to 30 minutes
- Patients who stayed less than or equal to 24 hours postoperatively. Burn patients (refer to Specifications
Manual, National Healthcare Quality Measures, Appendix A, Table 5.14 for ICD-9-CM codes).
- Patients who are on warfarin prior to admission.
- Patients with contraindications to both mechanical and pharmacological prophylaxis. Patients whose
ICD-9-CM - Prinicpal Procedure occurred prior to the date of admission
end time
[IP]
CMS

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- neuraxial anesthesia administered
- general anesthesia administered
- laparoscopic procedure performed
- VTE prophylaxis medication administered
- VTE prophylaxis medication intolerance
- Antithrombotic device applied
- Antithrombotic device intolerance
- Surgical incision time
- anesthesia end time
- hospital admission
- hospital discharge
- burn diagnosis
- warfarin administered
- Antithrombotic device refused
- comfort measures only
- clinical trials for VTE

 

Recommend

Exclusions may need to be relaxed for 2011 ("antithrombotic device
refused," "comfort measures only," clinical trials for VTE," "Antithrombotic device intolerance"). Consider a single field for "contraindication" to cover exclusions.

Most complex is identification of "antithrombotic device" and "antithrombotic device applied."  These two items are gaps in standards. Recommend this measure not be used and substitute, instead, the Stroke
measure for anticoagulation with atrial fibrillation.

 

To obtain some insight as to methodologies that can be utilized, see Perioperative Care at PQRI - 2009 Group Quality Measures

 

 

6.  % of orders (for medications, lab tests, procedures, radiology, and referrals) entered directly by physicians through CPOE.
Edit section

No current measures

 

 % of med/all orders entered into CPOE

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrine
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery


Title Medical Home System Survey
Description:  Percentage of practices functioning as a patient-centered medical home by providing ongoing, coordinated patient care. Meeting Medical Home System Survey standards demonstrates that practices have physician-led teams that provide patients with:
a. Improved access and communication
b. Care management using evidence-based guidelines
c. Patient tracking and registry functions
d. Support for patient self-management
e. Test and referral tracking
f. Practice performance and improvement functions

Measure by attestation
 
Steward(s) National Committee for Quality Assurance
Project(s) Health Information Technology Structural Measures
Endorsed 2008-08-29

 

Measures:

Attestation - Survey

 

See - Use CPOE for all orders

 

 

7.  Use of high‐risk medications (Re: Beers criteria) in the elderly
Edit section

 

Title: Drugs to be avoided in the elderly: a. Patients who receive at least one drug to be avoided, b. Patients
who receive at least two different drugs to be avoided.*
Description: Percentage of patients ages 65 years and older who received at least one drug to be avoided in
the elderly in the measurement year.
Percentage of patients 65 years of age and older who received at least two different drugs to be avoided in
the elderly in the measurement year.
Numerator:
a: at least one prescription for any drug to be avoided in the elderly in the measurement year.
b: At least two different drugs to be avoided in the elderly in the measurement year.
Denominator: All patients ages 65 years and older as of December 31 of the measurement year.
Exclusions: None
[OP]
NCQA
[IP] none

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- high risk medication for elderly prescribed

 

Recommend

Use existing list of high risk medications for the elderly. The committee challenged the measure
in that a single prescription for one high risk medication may be appropriate and adversely affect
the physician's score. Consideration for modification requested.


 

8. % of patients over 50 with annual colorectal cancer screenings [OP].
Edit section

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery
 

PQRI 113: Preventive Care and Screening: Colorectal Cancer Screening
Title: Colorectal Cancer Screening*
Description: Percentage of adults 50-80 years of age who had appropriate screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) including fecal occult blood test during the measurement year or, flexible sigmoidoscopy during the measurement year or the four years prior to the measurement year or, double contrast barium enema during the measurement year or the four years prior to the measurement year or, colonoscopy during the measurement year or the nine years prior to the measurement year
[OP] NCQA
[IP] - none
 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- history of colorectal cancer diagnosis
- history of colectomy procedure
- fecal occult blood test performed
- flexible sigmoidoscopy performed
- double contrast barium enema performed
- colonoscopy performed (TBD - Is CAT Scan imaged colonoscopy in the code set for colonoscopy?)

 

Recommend

Colorectal cancer diagnosis is expected on the Problem List.

 

See - Colorectal cancer screening.

 

9.  % of females over 50 receiving annual mammogram [OP]
Edit section

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Gynecology

PQRI 112: Preventive Care and Screening: Screening Mammography [PQRI age range 40-69]
Title: Breast Cancer Screening*
Description: Percentage of eligible women 50-69 who receive a mammogram in a two year period
Numerator: One or more mammograms during the measurement year or the year prior to the measurement year.
Denominator: Women 52-69 years as of December 31 of the measurement year. 
Note:  Given the measurement look back period, women 50-69 will be captured in this measure.
Exclusions: Exclude women who had a bilateral mastectomy and for whom administrative data does not indicate that a mammogram was performed.  Look for evidence of bilateral mastectomy as far back as possible in the patient’s history, through either administrative data or medical record review (exclusionary evidence in the medical record must include a note indicating a bilateral mastectomy.)  If there is evidence of two separate mastectomies, this patient may be excluded from the measure.  The bilateral mastectomy must have occurred by December 31st of the measurement year.
[OP]
NCQA
 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- mammogram performed
- history of mastectomy procedure
- history of bilateral mastectomy procedure

 

Recommend

No specific comments

 

See - Screening mammography.

 

 

10.  % patients at high‐risk for cardiac events on aspirin prophylaxis [OP] .
Edit section

Ambulatory
Cardiology
Neurology

Title: Ischemic Vascular Disease (IVD): Use of Aspirin or another Antithrombotic.*
Description:  Percentage of patients who have documentation of use of aspirin or another antithrombotic during the 12-month measurement period.
Numerator: The number of patients who have documentation of use of aspirin or another antithrombotic during the 12-month measurement period.
Documentation in the medical record must include, at a minimum, a note indicating the date on which aspirin or another antithrombotic was prescribed or documentation of prescription from another treating physician.
Denominator: A systematic sample of patients, age 18 years and older with a diagnosis of ischemic vascular disease (IVD) for at least 12 months, who have been under the care of the physician or physician group for IVD for at least 12 months (this is defined by documentation of a face-to-face visit for IVD care between the physician and the patient that predates the most recent IVD visit by at least 12 months.)
Codes to Identify:
Patient with a Diagnosis of Ischemic Vascular Disease
If using health plan administrative claims to identify the eligible population and then attributing to physicians, use the following denominator specifications:
Discharged alive for AMI, CABG or PTCA on or between 1/1-11/1 of the year prior to the measurement year or at one outpatient or acute inpatient during the measurement year and year prior to the measurement year.
AMI: ICD-9
PTCA: CPT
CABG: CPT
Codes to Identify a Patient with a Diagnosis of Ischemic Vascular Disease:-
ICD-9
DRG
Outpatient Codes: CPT
Acute inpatient: CPT
Presentation of Codes:
Unless otherwise noted, codes are stated to the minimum specificity required.  For example, if a three digit code is listed, it is valid as a three-, four- or five-digit code.  When necessary, a code may be specified with an “x” which represents a required digit.  For example ICD-9 CM diagnosis code 640.0x means that a fifth digit is required, but the fifth digit could be any number allowed by the coding manual.
Exclusions: Exclude patient self-report.
[OP]
Steward: NCQA
Endorsed: 12/01/2006

Contraindications?
 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- active diagnosis ischemic vascular disease
- ambulatory care encounter
- aspirin medication order
- Antithrombotic medication order
- patient self-reported diagnosis


Recommend

Diagnosis of "ischemic vascular diasease" is on the Problem List. "Patient self-reported diagnosis" may be problematic and should be modified for 2011.

 

See Aspirin Discussed

 

 

11a.  % eligible patients who received flu vaccine [OP].
Edit section

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrine
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery


PQRI - 110: Preventive Care and Screening: Influenza Immunization for Patients ≥ 50 Years
Title: Influenza Vaccination*
Description: Percentage of patients who received an influenza vaccination
Numerator: Patients who received influenza vaccination from September through February of the year prior to the measurement period
ICD-9-CM codes for need vaccine: V04.81
Or
CPT procedure codes for adult influenza vaccine: 90656, 90657, 90658, 90660
Or
HCDCS code: G0008
Or
Medical record includes documentation of patient report of having received the vaccination
Denominator: All patients => 50 years of age at the beginning of the one-year measurement period
Patient Selection:
CPT codes for patient visits: 99201-99205, 99212-99215, 99241-99245, 99354-99355, 99386-99387, 99396-99397, 99401-99404, 90471-90474
And
Patient’s age is > 50 years at the beginning of the one-year measurement period
Exclusions:
- Egg allergy (ICD-9-CM codes: 693.1, V15.03, 995.68)
- Adverse reaction to influenza vaccine (995.0 and E949.6, 995.1 and E949.6, 995.2 and E949.6)
- Other medical reason(s) documented by the practitioner for not receiving an influenza vaccination
- Patient reason(s) (eg, economic, social, religious)
[OP] AMA

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- influenza vaccination administered
- influenza vaccination documented
- influenza vaccination refused
- medical reason for not administering influenza vaccine
- patient reason for not receiving influenza vaccine
- egg allergy
- influenza vaccine intolerance

 

Recommend

History of influenza vaccine should be documented; EHR will need to be configured for this item as a
searchable field (many ambulatory systems have already done so). Allergy should be present on an
Allergy List but intolerance may be more difficult to find. Patient and medical reason will require some form of 'attestation;' consider 'contraindication' field.

 

 

11b.

Nursing Home
Home Health
Primary Care
Pediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrine
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery

Title: Influenza Vaccination of Nursing Home/ Skilled Nursing Facility Residents
Description: Percent of nursing home/ skilled nursing facility residents given the influenza vaccination during the flu season.

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- influenza vaccine admistered

- influenza vaccine offered

- influenza vaccine history

- influenza vaccine allergy

- nursing home risk category assessment

- admission to long term care

- discharge from long term care

- bone marrow transplant history

- chemotherapy history

- radiation therapy history

 

Recommend

History of influenza vaccine should be documented; EHR will need to be configured for this item as a
searchable field (many ambulatory systems have already done so). Allergy should be present on an
Allergy List but intolerance may be more difficult to find. Patient and medical reason will require some form of 'attestation;' consider 'contraindication' field.

 

As an example, see Influenza immunization for patients ≥ 50 years old.




12.  % lab results incorporated into EHR in coded format [OP,IP]
Edit section


Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrine
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery

Title Medical Home System Survey
Description:  Percentage of practices functioning as a patient-centered medical home by providing ongoing, coordinated patient care. Meeting Medical Home System Survey standards demonstrates that practices have physician-led teams that provide patients with:
a. Improved access and communication
b. Care management using evidence-based guidelines
c. Patient tracking and registry functions
d. Support for patient self-management
e. Test and referral tracking
f. Practice performance and improvement functions

Measure by attestation

Attest by quartile - for 2011
 
Steward(s) National Committee for Quality Assurance
Project(s) Health Information Technology Structural Measures
Endorsed 2008-08-29

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

Attestation - Survey

 

Recommend

Single annual survey

 

See - Incorporate lab test results into EHR as structured data.

 

 

 

13.  Stratify reports by gender, insurance type, primary language, race, ethnicity [OP, IP]
Edit section

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrine
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery
 

NQF has identified quality measurement criteria for which there are known disparities.   CMS can use these criteria for stratification.

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- gender
- insurance type
- primary language
- race
- ethnicity

 

Recommend

 Not a specific measure

 

See - Record demographics - preferred language, insurance type, gender, race, ethnicity

 

 

14.  % of all medications, entered into EHR as generic, when generic options exist in the relevant drug class [EP, IP]
Edit section

 

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Develop attestation measure

 

 

15.  % of orders for high-cost imaging services with specific structured indications recorded [EP, IP]
Edit section

 

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Develop attestation measure

 

 

16.  % claims submitted electronically to all payers [EP, IP]
Edit section

 

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Develop attestation measure

 

See - Submit claims electronically to public and private payers

 

 

17.  % patient encounters with insurance eligibility confirmed [EP, IP]
Edit section

 

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Develop attestation measure

 

See - Check insurance eligibility electronically from public and private payers, where possible

 

 

18.  % of all patients with access to personal health information electronically [EP, IP]
Edit section

 

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Develop attestation measure

 


.  % of all patients with access to personal  health information electronically [OP, IP] .  (Draft - 7/2009)

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrine
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery

 

Title Medical Home System Survey
Description:  Percentage of practices functioning as a patient-centered medical home by providing ongoing, coordinated patient care. Meeting Medical Home System Survey standards demonstrates that practices have physician-led teams that provide patients with:
a. Improved access and communication
b. Care management using evidence-based guidelines
c. Patient tracking and registry functions
d. Support for patient self-management
e. Test and referral tracking
f. Practice performance and improvement functions

Measure by attestation
 
Steward(s) National Committee for Quality Assurance
Project(s) Health Information Technology Structural Measures
Endorsed 2008-08-29

 

Measures:

Attestation - Survey

 

See - Provide patients with timely electronic access to their health information

 

 

19.  % of all patients with access to patient specific educational resources [EP, IP]
Edit section

 

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Develop attestation measure

 

See - Patient access to patient-specific education resources

 


20.  % of encounters for which clinical summaries were provided [EP]
Edit section

 

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Develop attestation measure

 

See - Provide clinical summaries for patients for each encounter

 


21.  Report 30‐day readmission rate [IP].
Edit section

 

Title: All-Cause Readmission Index (risk adjusted)*
Title: All-Cause Readmission Index (risk adjusted)*
Description: Overall inpatient 30-day hospital readmission rate.
Numerator: Measured outcome: 30-day all-cause readmissions for patients discharged from the hospital
with a principal diagnosis of HF, as measured from the date of discharge of the index HF admission
Denominator: Included population: Index admissions for Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries age 65 or
over admitted to the hospital with a principal ICD-9-CM discharge diagnosis of heart failure and discharged
alive
Exclusions: Age <65
In-hospital deaths
Incomplete data (without FFS Part A, without 12 mo enrollment prior to discharge, without 1 month
enrollment post discharge)
Transfers out
Additional HF admissions within 30 days
[IP]
Steward: United Health Group

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- hospital admission
- hospital discharge
- maternity diagnosis
- transfer to acute care hospital
- death

 

Recommend

Providers will be able to report only for discharges from their own facilities without HIE support.
Address:
2011 – readmissions to same hospital
2013 – readmissions to hospitals within the same enterprise
2015 – readmissions to any other hospital
+E30

 

 

22a.  % of encounters where med reconciliation was performed [OP, IP].
Edit section

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrine
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery

 

Title: Medication Reconciliation *
Description: Percentage of patients aged 65 years and older discharged from any inpatient facility (e.g. hospital, skilled nursing facility, or rehabilitation facility) and seen within 60 days following discharge in the office by the physician providing on-going care who had a reconciliation of the discharge medications with the current medication list in the medical record documented.
[OP] NCQA

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- hospital discharge
- outpatient visit encounter
- medication reconciliation completed

 

Recommend

While attestation required, there is no method to identify a cognitive process without attestation.

 

 

22b

Care for Older Adults – Medication Review (COA)
IP Owner:
National Committee for Quality Assurance
At least one medication review conducted by a prescribing practitioner or clinical pharmacist during the
measurement year and the presence of a medication list in the medical record
A medication review is a review of a member’s medications including prescription medications, over the
counter medications (OTC) or herbal therapies. A medication list is a list of member’s medications in the
medical record which may include prescriptions, over the counter medications and herbal therapies or
supplements. Documentation must come from the same medical record and must include the following:
•A medication list in the medical record, and
•Evidence of a medication review and the date on which it was performed
At a minimum, medication review is documentation that a practitioner has reviewed all medications that the
member is taking (including prescriptions, OTCs and herbal or supplemental therapies). A review of side
effects for a single medication at the time of prescription alone is not sufficient. If the member is not taking
any medications, notation of this fact and the date on which it was noted is also considered numerator
compliant.
Codes to indentify medication review: Medication review (CPT 90862, 99605, 99606), (HCPCS G8427, G8428,
G8530), (CPT-II 1160F)
Medication List (CPT-II 1159F)
Denominator: All patients 66 and older as of December 31 of the measurement year

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- birthdate

 

Recommend

While attestation required, there is no method to identify a cognitive process without attestation.

 

 

22c.

Measure#MM-028-08
Title:
Medication Reconciliation Post-Discharge (MRP)
Medication reconciliation on or within 30 days after discharge.
Documentation in the medical record must include evidence of medication reconciliation, and the date on
which it was performed. The following evidence meets criteria:
•A list of medications that were prescribed or ordered upon discharge, or
•Notation that no medications were prescribed or ordered upon discharge
Codes to identify medication reconciliation: CPT-II 1111F
Denominator: All patients 66 and older as of December 31 of the measurement year
All patients 66 years and older as of December 31 of the measurement year.
IP Owner:
National Committee for Quality Assurance

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

-

 

Recommend

While attestation required, there is no method to identify a cognitive process without attestation.

 

See - Perform medication reconciliation at relevant encounters and each transition of care

 

23.  Implemented ability to exchange health  information with external clinical entity (specifically labs, care summary and medication lists) [OP, IP].
Edit section

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics
Cardiology
Endocrine
Gastroenterology
Gynecology
Neurology
Psychiatry
Surgery

 

Title Medical Home System Survey
Description:  Percentage of practices functioning as a patient-centered medical home by providing ongoing, coordinated patient care. Meeting Medical Home System Survey standards demonstrates that practices have physician-led teams that provide patients with:
a. Improved access and communication
b. Care management using evidence-based guidelines
c. Patient tracking and registry functions
d. Support for patient self-management
e. Test and referral tracking
f. Practice performance and improvement functions

Measure by attestation
 
Steward(s) National Committee for Quality Assurance
Project(s) Health Information Technology Structural Measures
Endorsed 2008-08-29
 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

Attestation - Survey

 

Recommend

Annual survey

 

See


 

 

24.  % of transitions in care for which summary care record is shared (e.g., electronic, paper, e-Fax) [EP, IP].
Edit section

 

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Develop attestation measure

 

See

 

 

25.  Report up‐to‐date status for childhood immunizations [OP].
Edit section

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics
 

Title: Childhood Immunization Status *
Description: Percentage of children 2 years of age who had four DtaP/DT, three IPV, one MMR, three H influenza type B, three hepatitis B, one chicken pox vaccine (VZV) and four pneumococcal conjugate vaccines by their second birthday. The measure calculates a rate for each vaccine and two separate combination rates
Numerator:  For all antigens, count any of the following:
•evidence of the antigen or combination vaccine, or
•documented history of the illness, or
•a seropositive test result.
For combination vaccinations that require more than one antigen (i.e., MMR), find evidence of all of the antigens.  For immunization information obtained from the medical record, count patients where there is evidence that the antigen was rendered from:
•a note indicating the name of the specific antigen and the date of the immunization, or
•a certificate of immunization prepared by an authorized health care provider or agency including the specific dates and types of immunizations administered.
For documented history of illness or a seropositive test result, find a note indicating the date of the event. The event must have occurred by the patient’s second birthday.
 Notes in the medical record indicating that the patient received the immunization “at delivery” or “in the hospital” may be counted toward the numerator. This applies only to immunizations that do not have minimum age restrictions (e.g., prior to 42 days after birth).   A note that the “patient is up-to-date” with all immunizations that does not list the dates of all immunizations and the names of the immunization agents does not constitute sufficient evidence of immunization for this measure.
Denominator: A systematic sample drawn from children who turn two years of age during the measurement year.
Exclusions: None
[OP]
Steward: NCQA
 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- DtaP/Dt administered
- IPV administered
- MMR administered
- Hib administered
- Hepatitis b vaccine administered
- VZV administered
- pneumococcal conjugate vaccine administered
- varicella history
- active Hepatitis b
- Hepatitis b immunity

 

Recommend

Patient and medical reason for exclusion will require some form of 'attestation;' consider 'contraindication' field.

 

See - Capability to submit electronic data to immunization registries and actual submission where required and accepted

 

 

26.  % reportable lab results submitted electronically [IP].
Edit section

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Develop attestation measure

 

See - Incorporate lab test results into EHR as structured data

 

 

27.  Full compliance with HIPAA Privacy and  Security Rules.
Edit section

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Defer to Privacy and Security Workgroup

 

See - Compliance wih HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules

 

 

28.  Conduct or update a security risk assessment and implement security updates as necessary.
Edit section

No current measures

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

NA

 

Recommend

Defer to Privacy and Security Workgroup

 

See - Compliance wih HIPAA Privacy and Security Rules

 

 

29.  Other Measures Under Consideration.
Edit section


(In addition to initial Policy Measure 2011 Grid)

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Cardiology
 

PQRI 7: Coronary Artery Disease (CAD): Beta-Blocker Therapy for CAD Patients with Prior Myocardial Infarction (MI)*
Title: CAD: Beta-Blocker Therapy-Prior myocardial infarction (MI)
Description: Percentage of patients with prior MI at any time who were prescribed beta-blocker therapy.
Numerator: Patients who were prescribed beta blocker therapy
(drug list available at www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/4837.html) OR
CPT-II code: 4006F Beta-blocker therapy prescribed
Denominator: All patients with CAD who also have prior MI at any time > 18 years of age
Patient Selection: 
ICD-9-CM codes for CAD
Or
CPT codes
And
ICD-9-CM codes for MI
And
Patient’s age is > 18 years
Exclusions: Documentation of medical reason(s) for not prescribing beta-blocker therapy:
•Documentation of bradycardia < 50 bpm (without beta-blocker therapy) on two consecutive readings, history of Class IV (congestive) heart failure, history of second- or third-degree atrioventricular (AV) block without permanent pacemaker.  ICD-9-CM exclusion codes
Or
•Other medical reason(s) documented by the practitioner for not prescribing beta blocker therapy;
Or
•CPT-II code with modifier:  4006F 1P
Documentation of patient reason(s) (e.g., economic, social, religious)
Or
CPT-II code with modifier:  4006F 2P
Documentation of system reason(s) for not prescribing beta-blocker therapy;
OR
CPT II w/modifier 4006F 3P
[OP]
Steward: AMA
Endorsed: 7/01/2006
 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- active diagnosis coronary artery disease
- past history myocardial infarction
- heart rate < 50 (bradycardia) physical finding
- beta blocker prescription

 

Recommend

Expect diagnosis on the Problem List using ICD-9 or SNOMED. Expect presence of medications on the Medication List (and do not accept CPT-II codes). Patient and medical reason for exclusion will require some form of 'attestation;' consider 'contraindication' field.

 

 

30.  Other Measures Under Consideration.
Edit section


(In addition to initial Policy Measure 2011 Grid)

Ambulatory

Primary Care

Cardiology


PQRI 5: Heart Failure: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme (ACE) Inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARB) Therapy for Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)*
Title: Heart Failure (HF) : ACEI/ ARB Therapy
Description: Percentage of patients with HF who also have left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) who were prescribed ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy.
Numerator: Patients who were prescribed ACEI or ARB therapy 
(drug list available at www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/4837.html)
Or
CPT-II code: 4009F Angiotensin Converting Enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or Angiotensin Receptor Blocker therapy prescribed
Denominator: All HF patients > 18 years of age with LVEF < 40% or with moderately or severely depressed left ventricular systolic function
Patient Selection:
ICD-9-CM codes for HF
And
CPT procedure codes for LVF assessment testing
And
Additional individual medical record review must be completed to identify for those patients who were tested had documentation of an ejection fraction < 40% (use most recent value) or moderately or severely depressed left ventricular systolic function
Or
[CPT-II codes: 3021F Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 40% or documentation of moderately or severely depressed left ventricular systolic function; 3022F Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) = 40% or documentation as normal or mildly depressed left ventricular systolic function]
And
Patient’s age is > 18 years
Exclusions: Documentation of medical reason(s) for not prescribing ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy:
•Allergy or intolerance to ACE inhibitor or ARB;
Or
•ACE inhibitor contraindications including angioedema, anuric renal failure, moderate or severe aortic stenosis or pregnancy ICD-9-CM exclusion codes
Or
•Other medical reason documented by the practitioner for not prescribing ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy;
Or
•CPT-II code w/modifier:  4009F 1P
Patient reason (e.g., economic, social, religious)
Or
CPT-II code w/modifier:  4009F 2P
Documentation of system reason(s) for not prescribing ACE inhibitor or ARB therapy
Or
CPT II code 4009F 3P
[OP]
Steward: AMA

 

Measures:

- age
- active diagnosis congestive heart failure
- left ventricular function diagnostic study order
- left ventricular function diagnostic study result
- active diagnosis left ventricular systolic dysfunction
- left ventricular systolic ejection fraction
- angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor prescription
- angiotensin receptor blocker prescription
- angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor allergy
- angiotensin converting enzyme intolerance
- angiotensin receptor blocker allergy
- antiotensin receptor blocker intolerance
- active diagnosis of anuric renal failure
- past history angioedema
- active pregnancy
- moderate to severe aortic stenosis diagnosis
- medical reasons for avoiding ACEI, ARB
- patient refusal
- system reasons for avoiding ACEI, ARB

 

Recommend

Expect diagnosis on the Problem List using ICD-9 or SNOMED. Expect presence of medications on the Medication List (and do not accept CPT-II codes). Patient and medical reason for exclusion will require some form of 'attestation;' consider 'contraindication' field.

 

See - Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) therapy for patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes and/or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD)

 

 

31.  Other Measures Under Consideration.
Edit section


(In addition to initial Policy Measure 2011 Grid)

Ambulatory
Primary Care
Pediatrics

Title: Use of appropriate medications for people with asthma
Description: Percentage of patients who were identified as having persistent asthma during the measurement year and the year prior to the measurement year and who were dispensed a prescription for either an inhaled corticosteroid or acceptable alternative medication during the measurement year
Numerator:  Documentation in the medical record must include, at a minimum, a note indicating the patient received a t least one written prescription for inhaled corticosteroids, nedocromil, cromolyn sodium, leukotriene modifiers or methylxanthines during the measurement year.
Denominator:  All patients ages 5-56 years as of December 31 of the measurement year with persistent asthma reported in three age stratifications (5-9, 10-17, 18-56) and as a combined rate.
Exclusions: Exclude from the eligible population all patients diagnosed with emphysema and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) anytime on or prior to December 31 of the measurement year as identified by the following codes, or for medical record collection, as documented within the chart:
EmphysemaICD-9 codes (492, 506.4, 518.1, 518.2)COPD ICD-9 codes: (491.2, 493.2, 496, 506.4)
[OP]
Steward: NCQA

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- age
- active diagnosis persistent asthma
- active diagnosis emphysema
- active diagnosis chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
- inhaled corticosteroid prescription
- leukotriene modifier prescription
- methylxanthine prescription
- nedocromil prescription
- cromolyn sodium prescription

 

Recommend

Stage this measure - use of appropriate medications for asthma in 2011. Expect appropriate medication by asthma stage (e.g., chronic persistent asthma) in 2013. Asthma staging requires further analysis at this
time.

 

See - Asthma

 

 

32.  Other Measures Under Consideration -Inpatient .
Edit section

Inpatient
Primary Care
Cardiology
Neurology
 

Title: Patients with Atrial Fibrillation Receiving Anticoagulation Therapy
Description: Patients with an ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation discharged on anticoagulation therapy.
Numerator: Patients discharged on anticoagulation therapy.
Denominator: Patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke with documented atrial fibrillation.
Exclusions:
• Patients discharged/transferred to another short term general hospital for inpatient care
• Patients who expire
• Patients who left against medical advice
• Patients discharged to hospice
• Patients receiving comfort measures only
• Patients admitted for the performance of elective carotid endarterectomy
[IP]
Steward(s) The Joint Commission
Project(s) NVCS for the Prevention and Management of Stroke Across the Continuum of Care
Endorsed 2008-07-31

 

Measures:  QDS Datatypes (HITEP)

- active diagnosis ischemic stroke
- active diagnosis atrial fibrillation
- elective carotid endarterectomy performed
- death
- signed out against medical advice
- transfer to inpatient facility
- transfer to short-term hospital
- discharge to hospice
- comfort measures only
- anticoagulation therapy administered

 

Recommend

Patient and medical reason for exclusion will require some form of 'attestation;' consider 'contraindication' field.

 

  

Standards and Coding Systems
Edit section

Meaningful use will require the incorporation of a large alphabet soup of standards that include SNOMED-CT, ICD-10, LOINC, RxNorm, CCD/CDA, and many others. Here is where the real utility of SMARText comes in. As the standards evolve, SOAPware, Inc. will be adding the necessary codes to the SMARText items already in use that are in the online library. See - SMARText Literacy vs. Traditional Medical Record Illiteracy. Users can periodically update their SMARText items to automatically incorporate rapidly evolving standards. See - Q: How do I update SMARText items?

Also see - Standards and Coding Systems.

The era of physicians only needing to incorporate ICD-9CM for diagnoses and CPT for procedures is coming to end. SMARText offers an ability to adapt/adopt with minimal with minimal disruption, once a medical practice has made the switch to using documentation templates(i.e. docuplates) that contain documentation items (i.e. SMARText) that can contain/satisfy many different coding systems in the background.

 

Links
Edit section

 

Links - July, 2009
Edit section

Meaningful Use Definition Gets Initial OK
http://www.healthdatamanagement.com/...e-38665-1.html

Meaningful Use, Take II
http://practicefusion.typepad.com/we...e-take-ii.html

Healthcare IT Committee Adopts “Meaningful Use” Definition
http://www.aami.org/news/2009/072209.ehr.html

http://www.ihealthbeat.org/Articles/.../7/22/Experts-
Say-Timeline-for-Meaningful-Use-Might-Be-Prohibitive.aspx

Meaningful Use vs. Meaningless Adoption of Electronic Health Records
http://www.thehealthcareblog.com/the...h-records.html

Effect of Stimulus Package on Meaningful EHR Use by Providers
http://www.medicexchange.com/Product...providers.html

Administration Facing Tough Sell To Doctors On Health IT
http://news.yahoo.com/s/mcclatchy/20...tchy/3274995_1

AMIA Comments on Meaningful Use
http://www.amia.org/files/shared/_TH...07_14_09_0.pdf

 


Page last modified 04:02, 10 Feb 2010 by roates
Page Tags:
Comments
Copyright © 2008 SOAPware, Inc. All rights reserved. Contact UsNews Blog RSS Feed